Who Employs The Gourvenecs?

A little while ago I sent an email about the alleged activities of the Gourvenec family to all six members of Parliament from the Sheffield area, where most of the Gourvenecs live. In that email, I did not mention the name of the family, only their type of operations. Within a few days after that, my profile on the Linkedin website was viewed twice by people named Gourvenec. Kevin Gourvenec and Marc Gourvenec both were searching around the internet for information on me. This indicates that someone on the short list of recipients of my email recognised from a description of their crimes what the name of the family in question was and informed them that someone was onto them. 

That could only have been a member of Parliament or an aide to one. If the stories I was told by Eve Martin, the Gourvenec family member I interviewed extensively in Guatemala several months ago were not true, if she was only spinning fantasies and making up the claims that her relatives are criminals employed by the British government for illegal operations, then nobody would have known from a description of such activities who I meant. I consider this recognition of what family was referenced to be very strong evidence that those stories are true. 

It is also equally strong evidence that at least one member of Parliament was already aware of those crimes. And saw fit to warn the Gourvenec family about me instead of contacting the police and urging an investigation of the criminals. So a member of Parliament is an accomplice to the Gourvenecs long list of illegal actions. I am not a lawyer and have no idea if there is a legal duty of an MP to report criminal activity of which he becomes aware, but even if there is no legal duty to do so, there is certainly an ethical one. And one that the public might well be expected to take into consideration at election time. 

There are also a number of international treaty obligations under treaties to which the U.K. is a signatory. Eve was unwillingly conscripted into government service. Both slavery and forcible service from underage children are violations of human rights. She told me details of several terrorist operations conducted by the Gourvenecs in which numerous people died. These took place in countries with which the U.K. was not at war. If the British legal system fails to deal properly with the Gourvenecs and whoever in London employed and authorised them, the U.K. could be charged in an international court with crimes under international law. 

At this time, I have no way to know which of the six Parliamentarians on my list was the one who knew of the crimes of the Gourvenecs, but there is one who at first glance looks more likely than the others. That one happens to be the Deputy Prime Minister. The reason I tend to suspect him more than the others is that for activities of the sort the Gourvenecs have done the authorisation of the Prime Minister would probably be sought. And since the Deputy Prime Minister is the designated probable successor in the event of the sudden death of a Prime Minister, it seems likely he would have to be kept informed of anything he might need to know upon assuming that office. 

Or I could be wrong. Perhaps the Gourvenecs and their sponsors are a rogue agency and not accountable to any elected government officials. In that case, the British public certainly needs to know all about them.