Total Pageviews

Sunday, 19 July 2015

IS EVE MARTIN THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATOO?

In the international best-seller, the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo and it's two sequels, The Girl Who Played With Fire, and The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet's Nest, the late Swedish author, Steig Larson, wrote about a girl raised in an abusive family whose father, Zalachenko, a professional hit-man, was involved in sexual trafficking of young girls and other crimes, but could not be charged because the Swedish Security Service were protecting him because of his value to them as an intelligence asset. His son is also a psychopath and accomplice of his father in criminal activities. The girl of the title, Lisbeth Salander, was a skilled fighter, trained in hand-to-hand combat, highly intelligent and thinks unusually quickly in an emergency, a highly moral person, though willing to kill if need be or when provoked, but frightened of her father and resigned to his being immune to legal prosecution.

When I first read the book, I immediately thought, " I know this girl!" I went on to read the other two volumes in the series, and the conviction grew that I had indeed met the woman Larson called, "Lisbeth Salander".

This book was a work of fiction, of course. That is, the plot and most of the incidents in the story are fictional, at least as far as I know. But the personalities of several of the main characters are based on the real-life Eve Martin, of Sheffield, U.K. whom I spent two months interviewing last year in Guatemala.

 Eve was raised in a very abusive family in England, a family that was involved in sexual trafficking of minors, as well as other crimes. And they could not be charged or prosecuted because they had protection from the British security services due to their value as operatives and assassins in intelligence work. Eve is skilled in hand-to-hand combat, is highly intelligent, a very moral and compassionate person, though willing to kill if need be or if provoked, thinks unusually quickly in an emergency, and is scared to death of her family and resigned to their being immune to legal action for their crimes and their abuse of her.

Steig Larson was not only a writer of fiction. He was also a long-time activist fighting against far-right groups and abuse of women. In that capacity, it is very possible that he had some connections with activists in Britain and might have heard something about the Gourvenec family and their services to the British Crown, especially since from things Eve said, it would seem they are quite far to the right of the political spectrum and therefore very likely to be known to the sort of contacts Larson would be likely to have in the U.K. 

He must have modeled Salander on Eve and the character of Salander's father, Zalachenko, on Eve's uncle, whom Eve describes as a "psychopath". Eve says her entire family are psychopaths, and that they intentionally bring up their children to become psychopaths. Eve herself is a very responsible and compassionate person, but nevertheless, has been forced to do things she would rather not have done. The close resemblance between the fictional characters in these books by Larson and the real-life individuals in England indicates that Larson knew something of the Gourvenecs and their association with the British government. He might even have met Eve personally. His portrayal of Salander certainly shows that he was aware of her. 

There are some minor differences that only add to the impression that Larson was aware of the real-life family in England and modeled his fictional characters on them, but attempted to disguise certain traits to conceal their identities. The story is set in his native Sweden, not in England, the Zalachenko family is of Russian origin, while the Gourvenec family name derives from France, and the fictional Salander is unusually short, while Eve Martin is unusually tall. Salander has numerous tattoos. Eve has numerous scars from being tortured by her relatives.

In the novels, a woman from another abusive family fled to Australia early in her life and became quite successful there. Eve has a female cousin who went to Australia early in her life and became quite successful there.

 The Zalachenkos have a connection with a motorcycle club, which are generally regarded in Sweden as a criminal element, who act as expendable muscle for them. The Gourvenecs have connections in the Roma community, who are generally regarded in England as a criminal element, who act as expendable muscle for them.

Such minor diferences are exactly what an author would be expected to do if he wanted to change a few minor details to hide the identities of the people he was writing about. All in all, the similarities far outweigh the relatively minor differences.

In one conversation with me, Eve suggested writing the story of her family as fiction in the form of a novel. I discouraged that idea. I wanted to present it as a true story so the guilty parties could eventually be brought to justice and I feared that if the public first was introduced to the facts in the form of fiction it would be harder to later convince anybody that the story was true. But events have made that caution obsolete and for better or for worse, the story, or at least a great deal of it, is now in the public awareness as a series of best-selling novels.

And, as with the series of novels, the final chapters still remain unwritten. 








--

Sunday, 28 June 2015

THE ISRAELI STORY



Eve Martin, whom I interviewed for several hours daily over a period of nearly two months, told me her family, most of them living in Sheffield, England, are an organized crime gang who often act as mercenaries for clients, including, at times, the British government or members of the Establis​h​ment. She said she was "informally" adopted ( = kidnapped ) ​as an infant into this violently abusive family and raised to take part in their criminal operations, frequently including murders. She asserted that if she had complained to the police she would have been killed and was frequently tortured as punishment if she balked at obeying orders. 

She asserted that on one occasion her uncles decided she was expendable and attached a bomb to her in such a way that she could not remove it, then sent her off with orders to blow herself up in a crowded public place in Tel Aviv. She was able to attract the attention of the Israeli police, who got a bomb disposal expert who was able to remove it without setting it off. When she returned to England, she was tortured as punishment for not obeying orders to kill herself. 

I should mention that she has scars to back up her claims of frequent torture and violent abuse, and one of those scars backs up her  story of how the bomb was attached to her body. It is hard to see how that particular scar could have resulted from any other type of injury. 

Although she did not say so, I suspect from various other things she has told me that she probably did not tell the Israeli police who had done this to her. She is well-conditioned to cover up for her family and probably lied to the police and told them some story about having been in Israel as a tourist and was​ kidnapped by strangers. 

She has no idea who hired her relatives to fake a terrorist bombing in Israel, but obviously, if it had succeeded, the Palestinians would have been blamed and the Israeli public would have demanded retaliation. So the question is, who would stand to benefit from increased tensions and stirring up of conflict in the Middle East? 

Since her family is not Jewish or Muslim by either religion or heritage, they are not likely to have any personal interest in the region and she tells me they are not into politics and do the things they do only for money. So somebody must have paid them to fake a terrorist attack on a crowd of civilians in Israel. 

Several possibilities come to mind. One is that the clients could have been some British arms merchants who would gain by selling weapons to one or both sides. Another possibility is that some fanatical far-right faction in Israel would gain in political influence if tensions increased. 

But a third possibility is that, in view of the fact that her family has frequently acted on behalf of the British government, that it could have been the Crown that was the  client in this case. I do not know why the U.K. government would want to create more tensions in the Middle East and bring down more Israeli retaliation upon the Palestinians, but if there is any reason they wished to do so, they could hardly have chosen a better method to do it.

​Another question also comes to mind: If there was one faked terrorist attack attempted, how many others might there have been? ​How many of the alleged suicide bombings over the years have really been suicidal fanatics, as the public narative tells us, and not the result of coercion? And if there have been many such attacks that really resulted from coercion, who was it that was forcing reluctant victims into conducting such attacks? And why?







--



--

Thursday, 25 June 2015

DOES SOME MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT KNOW ALL ABOUT THE GOURVENEC CRIME FAMILY?

 Does Some Member Of Parliament Know All About The Gourvenec Crime Family? 

On 11 Oct., 2014 I sent the following email to all six Members Of Parliament from the Sheffield area.

To: Members Of Parliament From Sheffield
Re: Constituent Forced Into Government Service

For the past several months I have been trying to confirm or disprove an incredible story told me by an English woman from Sheffield whom I met in Guatemala, where she currently resides.  She describes herself as a "slave", and having been a "child soldier, and if even a small portion of her story can be substantiated, somebody at a high level in the British government could be held responsible for a multitude of human rights violations at home and terrorist attacks in other countries.  I have now collected enough evidence to justify an expanded effort of investigation.

 The case is shaping up something like this:

An extended family based in Sheffield, with some family connections to the upper levels of the nobility, but without the formal titles or real estate, has, according to my informant, for several generations acted as an unofficial but de facto secret branch of the British government, providing plausable deniability  for operations illegal under both British and international law, including sabotage, assassinations, and blackmail.

Plausible deniability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


 I should note that she does not implicate the publicly-known SIS ( MI 6 ) and as far as I know, there is no connection between the two groups. At this time, there is no reason to believe SIS is even aware of the existence and activities of this family enterprise.

My informant, who claimed to be an adopted member of the family, said she was forced to take part in numerous illegal activities, includingf murders, from childhood on and was threatened with death if she refused or went to the police. She said that as a teen-ager, she tried on two ocassions to make complaints to the authorities and was ignored due to high-level influence.

She provided exact details of several specific instances of large-scale industrial sabotage operations and terrorist incidents in other countries which she alleged were undertaken by her relatives at the behest of unnamed government officials and commercial interests and claimed she was forced to take part. She said she was beaten and tortured by her relatives numerous times if she objected to these operations and was threatened with death if she revealed their secrets. She also said that on at least one occassion the Official Secrets Act was invoked.

She also stated that one of her uncles was once diagnosed as a psychopath and remanded to a psychiatric institution, but then released despite a court order of commitment being still in effect. This implies influence over either the courts or the public health authorities.

Even though the two worst uncles are now dead, she lives in fear of her remaining family and now, at age 41, was compelled to beg permission from them to be allowed to leave England. She is convinced it would be impossible to escape from the country without their permission because they can access immigration and airline computers and could have her detained at the airport. Such a capability implies a high-level connection to the State security apparatus and is far beyond the ability of a mere criminal gang. 

This woman suffers from serious guilt feelings from the things she was forced to do, but in daily detailed and extended conversations over a period of nearly two months, she sounded otherwise perfectly rational and not at all schizophrenic. I was initially quite skeptical of her story, but I have managed to dig up several bits of independent evidence that corrorborate it and now regard her story of being a modern Janissary to be mostly true, though she still tries to conceal important facts to protect her abusers. This ambivalence is common in people raised in abusive homes or in cults that practice mind control techniques and I beliueve she would benefit from Exit Counseling of the sort that has been developed to help former cult members disengage themselves from such groups. If she herself were to be charged with any criminal offenses for crimes undertaken on orders from her relatives, I believe a court would accept a plea of diminished responsibility. 

Stockholm Syndrome: The Psychological Mystery of Loving ...


She has forgiven the younger family members she calls her "brothers" for even the most outrageous abuses, including violent assaults, torture, attempting to kill her, the deaths of two of her children, and an assault that caused her to have a miscarriage.

On one occasion one of her uncles decided she was expendable and attached a bomb to her in such a way that she could not remove it and sent her off with orders to detonate it in a crowed public place in Israel. She was able to alert the Israeli security authorities and they brough in a bomb disposal expert who was able to remove it without blowing her up. She still returned home and submitted to torture as punishment for not following orders. Her body has numerous scars indicating torture.

She is grateful to her family for having protected her in many situations, even though she would never have been in those situations if not for them, and is full of praise for how they take care of her but fails to see their "concern" for her is conditional upon her behavior conforming to their demands. This is typical of victims in abusive relationships and mind control cults and is sometimes refered to as "Stockholm Syndrome".

  She claims that she was frequently forced to sleep with strangers, starting from around the age of 7 or 8 as bait in a "honey trap", entraping wealthy or influencial individuals in politics or the entertainment industry into illegal sex which was secretly videotaped for future blackmail. As she grew up, she recognized some of these men from the news media, including some members of Parliament.

She says she became pregnant and gave birth to a child at the age of 14 and the infant was taken from her and thereafter it's whereabouts was not disclosed to her but her relatives used threats to kill her child as a means to control her. This is partly confirmed by stretch marks indicating at least one full-term pregnancy.

She says she was trained as an assassin by one of her uncles and she displays a high level of skill in offensive aspects of unarmed combat such as might be considered useful for an assassin or commando, but no knowledge at all of even the most basic defensive measures, which are usually taught first in civilian martial arts courses.

She is now 41 years of age and this is the first time she has been allowed out on her own, having been allowed to leave England only after convincing a family meeting she could be trusted to keep their secrets. She is still in fear of her relatives and is afraid to return to the U.K. for fear of being tortured or killed or never being allowed to leave it again.


  I am continuing to gather evidence on this government-sponsored criminal operation and plan to eventually post it on a website, but I am not quite certain what else to do with it. If the family has protection at a high enough level that the police and Crown Prosecution Service will not take action, what steps can you suggest? Can you tell me, please, whom to contact and what procedures to follow? Any advice or information will be appreciated.
Sincerely,Paul Finnegan

Note that I did NOT mention the name of the family. That name is, Gourvenec

The addresses I sent it to include:
 

Within 48 hours after I sent it, my Linkedin profile on the Linkedin account I have in the pen name I used to sign the e-mail was viewed by somebody named Gourvenec, in the UK. From this I deduce that one ( at least ) of the recipients of my e-mail knew the Gourvenec family and knew enough of what they do to know from my description whom I meant.

 If the story this woman told me was something she made up and her relatives were only normal, innocent, law-abiding middle class people, nobody who happened to know them would have made any connection between them and this e-mail or thought to tell them of this e-mail.

The story I was told is thereby proven to be true and at least one of the people I sent the e-mail to is aware of the criminal activities of the Gourvenecs. Some MP or an aide to an MP is complicit in state-sponsored terrorism and multiple cases of murder and human rights violations by the Gourvenecs. 

--

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

Does Some Member Of Parliament Know All About The Gourvenec Crime Family?

Does Some Member Of Parliament Know All About The Gourvenec Crime Family?

On 11 Oct., 2014 I sent the following email to all six Members Of Parliament from the Sheffield area.
TO: Members Of Parliment From Sheffield
Re: Constituent Forced Into Government Service
For the past several months I have been trying to confirm or disprove an incredible story told me by an English woman from Sheffield whom I met in Guatemala, where she currently resides. She describes herself as a "slave", and having been a "child soldier", and if even a small portion of her story can be substantiated, somebody at a high level in the British government could be held responsible for a multitude of human rights violations and terrorist attacks in other countries. I have now collected enough evidence to justify an expanded effort of investigation.

This case is shaping up something like this:
An extended family based in Sheffield, with some family connections to the upper levels of the nobility, but without the formal titles or real estate, has according to my informant, for several generations acted as an unofficial but de facto secret branch of the British government, providing "plausible deniability" for covert operations illegal under both British and international law, specializing in sabotage, assassinations, and blackmail.

 It should be noted that she does not implicate the publicly-known SIS ( MI6 ) and there is as far as I know, no connection between these two groups. There is no reason to believe SIS is even aware of the existence and activities of this family enterprise.
According to my informant, who claimed to be an adopted member of the family, she was forced into taking part in numerous illegal actions, including murders, from childhood on and was threatened with death if she refused or went to the police. She claimed that as a teenager she tried on several occasions to make complaints to the authorities and they were ignored due to high-level influence. 
She also states that one of her uncles was once diagnosed as a psychopath and remanded to a psychiatric institution, but then released despite a court order of commitment still being in effect. This implies influence over the courts or health authorities.
She provided exact details of several specific instances of large-scale industrial sabotage operations and terrorist incidents in other countries which she alleged were undertaken by her relatives in which she was forced to help. She further claimed to have been beaten and tortured by her relatives numerous times if she objected to these operations and was threatened with death if she revealed their secrets.

Even though the two worst uncles are now dead, she lives in fear of her remaining family and now, at age 41, was compelled to beg permission from her cousins to leave England. She is convinced it would be impossible to escape from the country without their permission; that they can access immigration and airline computers and could have her detained at the airport.
That capability in itself indicates a high-level connection to the State security apparatus, not a mere criminal gang. In addition, she alleges that on at least one occasion, the Official Secrets Act was invoked.
This woman suffers from serious guilt feelings from the things she was forced to do, but in daily detailed and extended conversations over a period of  nearly two months, she sounded otherwise perfectly rational and not at all schizophrenic.

My first provisional diagnosis was Factitious Victimization Disorder, a recognized and well-studied variant of Baron Munchhausen Syndrome, but I have managed to dig up some independent corroboration for a few parts of her story and now regard her story of being a modern Janissary to be mostly true, though she still tries to conceal important facts to protect her abusers, leading to my thinking she also suffers from Stockholm Syndrome and despite her obvious hatred for the people who have stolen her life, still frequently tries to protect them and hide their secrets.
This ambivalence is common among people raised in abusive families or cults that practice mind-control techniques. In my opinion, her situation is similar enough to that of a cult member that she would benefit most from Exit Counseling of the type that has been developed to help former cult members disengage themselves from such groups. If she herself were to be charged with any criminal offenses for crimes undertaken upon orders of her relatives, I believe a court would accept a plea of diminished responsibility.

She has forgiven the younger relations she calls her "brothers" ( actually her cousins ) for even the most outrageous abuses, including violent assaults, torture, attempting to kill her, the deaths of two of her children and an assault that caused her to have a miscarriage.

On one occasion her uncle decided she was expendable and attached a bomb to her and sent her off to detonate it in a crowded place, but she was able to alert the authorities of that country and they managed to defuse it. She still returned home and submitted to torture as punishment.

 She is grateful for her family having protected her in situations that she would never have gotten into if not for them, is full of praise for how they take care of her, and fails to see their "concern" for her is conditional upon her behavior conforming to their demands. This is typical of victims in abusive relationships and mind-control cults. 
She claims she was used from the age of 7 or 8 as bait in a "honey trap", entrapping prominent individuals in both politics and the entertainment world into illegal sex which was secretly videotaped for future blackmail, and that in addition to extorting political influence from powerful individuals, wealthy entertainment celebrities are blackmailed to provide funding for politically motivated operations to eliminate the need for government funding.

She also said she became pregnant at an early age, gave birth, and the infant was taken from her and thereafter it's whereabouts was not disclosed to her but her relatives used threats to kill her child as a means to control her.
Her body has numerous scars indicating abuse, her abdomen shows stretch marks consistent with at least one full term pregnancy, and there are other signs that confirm her story, at least in it's basic outlines. In particular, she displays a knowledge of hand-to-hand combat of a type consistent with what would be taught to an assassin or commando, not the sort that is normally taught in civilian martial arts classes intended for self-defense.
She is now 41 years of age and this is the first time she has been out on her own, having been allowed to leave England only after convincing a family meeting she could be trusted to keep their secrets. Her apparent motive for telling me her story was a need to talk to somebody and to gain sympathy, but she went into a panic when she realized that instead of merely offering sympathy, I  intended to make serious efforts to expose and destroy this entire government-sponsored criminal operation.
 I am continuing to gather evidence and plan to eventually post it on a website, but I am not quite certain what else to do with it. If the family has protection at a high enough level that the police and Prosecution Service will not take action, what steps can you suggest? Can you tell me, please, whom to contact and what procedures to follow? Any advice or information will be appreciated.

Sincerely,
Paul Finnegan

Note that I did NOT mention the name of the family. That name is, Gourvenec. 
The addresses I sent it to include: 
Soon after I sent it, my Linkedin profile on the Linkedin account I have in the name I used to sign the email was viewed by somebody named Gourvenec, in the UK. From this I deduce that one ( at least ) of the recipients of my email knew the Gourvenec family and knew enough of what they do to know from my description who I meant. If the story Eve told me was something she made up and her relatives were only normal, innocent ,law-abiding middle class people, nobody who happened to know them would have made any connection between them and this email or thought to tell them of this email.
The story Eve told me is thereby proven to be true and at least one of the people I sent the email to is aware of the criminal activities of the Gourvenecs. Some MP or an aide to an MP is complicit in state-sponsored terrorism and multiple cases of murder and human rights violations by the Gourvenecs. 

THE OSAMA BIN LADEN STORY

Eve Martin told me that contrary to the official story of the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden, British intelligence had known his whereabouts for years and several British agents were stationed in his compound at various times. She stated that she and several other British agents had been regular visitors to his compound for at least seven years, coming and going frequently between his headquarters and the U.K. Eve said she had been sent there by her relatives and while there gave birth to a daughter. She did not say who the child's father was. The child was kept there as a hostage to ensure Eve would return from her trips back to the U.K. Another British female agent was also in residence and took over the task of taking care of the child when Eve was away. One of Eve's stepbrothers was also stationed there at least part of the time.

Apparently something went wrong with the relationship between the British team and OBL, and OBL blinded, then killed the child and also killed the other British woman. He then attacked Eve and was about to kill her when her stepbrother shot him. Just before he died, Eve gouged out one of his eyes in retaliation for his having blinded her daughter, but he died before she could gouge out the other eye. 

Eve then phoned the American Embassy and told them OBL was dead. They then staged the raid to account for his death and cover up the fact that Western intelligence had known all along where he was.

The British Foreign Office wanting to deny the presence of British agents in the compound of OBL for years and any connection with the Gourvenec clan, refused to help the survivors of the British team leave Pakistan, but the Americans refused to go along with that and gave them passage out of the country. The British agent who shot and killed OBL now lives in Palo Alto, California.

--

Monday, 15 June 2015

LINKS TO SOME BACKGROUND READING MATERIAL


Here are some links to articles that provide some background that may be helpful in evaluating the contents of this blog.


Group 13 - Deep Black Lies

 

A short history of British torture

 

 BBC News | UK | Troubled history of Official Secrets Act

Gourvenec War In Kuwait

Eve Martin describes in great detail several acts of sabotage that were publicly attributed to either terrorists or industrial accidents. Most of these were of a nature that only a government covert agency could have accomplished, confirming her allegations that her relatives are not a mere criminal gang, but constitute an unofficial but de facto branch of the British State security apparatus."

Here are some details about one such claim:

Eve tells me that durring the first Gulf War, at which time she would have been around 19 years old, and therefore an adult and legally free to come and go as she pleased, she was taken to Kuwait for a mission there. She absolutely rejects any suggestion that she could have simply refused to go. She acted as if I was a simpleton for saying she could have gone to the police and told them she was being ordered to leave Britain. When I pointed out that to get her out of the country they would have to escort her through immigration and security at an airport and she could speak up and say she was being kidnapped and the police would have taken them both into seperate rooms for questioning and held her uncle until she was on a plane to some other place where he would not have been able to track her, she claimed they would not have done that; that her uncle would have been able to convince them to allow him to take her out of the country anyway, no matter what
she said to them.

She was taken to Kuwait apparently to be a decoy to lure some Iraqi sentries into an ambush. After that, with these guards disposed of, her uncles, cousins, and stepbrothers  conducted sabotage of several hundred oil wells to "demonize", ( her word for it ) Sadam Husein by making it look as if the Iraqis had done it.

 The amount of munitions they would have needed to destroy so many oil wells, along with the land mines they deployed all around them to delay firefighters from putting out the fires, would have weighed tons and needed at least one truck to move. Where would a private gang of mercenaries get their hands on all that explosive in a war zone? And how could they transport it past numerous military checkpoints without proper authorization?Those considerations indicate the Gourvenec clan is not a mere criminal gang, but operates unofficially but de facto as a government agency.





--

Friday, 12 June 2015

OFFICIAL RECORDS SHOW SIGNS OF TAMPERING


​                                      ​
Official U.K. Death Records Show Signs Of Tampering To Erase Records Of Gourvenecs



Eve Martin, the English woman who told me her family in Sheffield are mercenaries who do assassinations on contract for the U.K. government, claimed her uncles could gain access to official records such as birth and death records, and alter them. That capability would indicate some high-level contacts and influence with the Home Office such as only a National Security agency would be likely to have.

I was quite intially skeptical of that claim, but there is some evidence to support it from the official death records of the Home Office.

Eve told me her grandmother's name was Olivia. 
She also told me she was named Eve after an uncle. The name, Yves is a common male given name in French, and would probably be rendered into English for a female child as Eve. 
A quick Google search brings up a large number of members of the Gourvenec family in the Sheffield area.
and according to Eve, the family has lived there for over a century. But in the listings of deaths over the past century, there are only two deaths recorded of people named Gourvenec in the entire country.

Why are there so few death records of them? How could
​so large ​
a family live in Sheffield for over a century and there are death records of only two of them in all that time?

Has somebody tried to erase all official records of them and simply missed a few?
​It certainly looks that way. ​
These two shown below are the only death records of people named Gourvenec in the U.K. in the period between 1916 and 2007. And both of them were not living in Sheffield at the time of death. It looks as if these two members of the family had moved to other cities before dying, probably when they retired, and someone has tampered with the official records of the family at the records office in Sheffield and forgot to do the same in other parts of the country.
England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007DEATH, BURIAL, CEMETERY & OBITUARIES
NAME: Olivia Ines Gourvenec
BIRTH: date
DEATH: dd mm 1996 - city, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, England


England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007DEATH, BURIAL, CEMETERY & OBITUARIES
NAME: Yves Gourvenec
BIRTH: date
DEATH: dd mm 1986 - city, Hertfordshire, England



--

Thursday, 4 December 2014

Recent News Stories Shed Light On The Gourvenecs Work

Recent news items tell stories remarkably similar to the personal

 narative told me by Eve Martin, long before these stories hit the

 news media. Ms. Martin claims that as a member of a family 

frequently employed by the Crown to conduct illegal operations, 

she was privy to details of many such activities and was 

frequently forced by her elders  to participate. Now portions of 

her story are starting to come out in the news from other sources,

confirming much of what she told me. . 




How secret renditions shed light on MI6's licence to kill and ...






--

Tuesday, 25 November 2014

Sexual Entrapment and Extortion ----- In The Name Of The Queen

In the unlamented days of the Bush regime in the United States, it was reported in the news that the U.S. was intercepting the phone calls of United Nations officials. As the events of the tumultous decade went on, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair seemed willing to sacrifice his standing with his own voters to curry favor with the American regime, there were jokes to the effect that the American CIA was tapping his phones and had tapes of his conversations with his mistress and were threatening to send them to his wife if he refused to play along with the American agenda in the Middle East. 

Well, in light of recent revelations by Edward Snowden, those jokes now seem a lot less far-fetched. 

And now evidence has surfaced that makes it seem very plausable indeed. A witness--a very credible witness who is in a position to know-- has stated that her family, which functions as an "unofficial", but de facto agency of the British Crown, has long been using blackmail about sexual indiscretions to influence both officials of other countries and those closer to home. 

There has been a lot in the news lately about sexual exploitation of children by persons in high places in the U.K. Some of the revelations that have come out indicate there were members of the security services who were aware of this activity, but covered it up and allowed it to go on. This raises the question, why would they do that? 

Several months ago I spent two months of daily interviews with a woman who might be able to provide some answers. Her name is Eve Martin and she is from Sheffield. And, according to her, her entire extended family, the Gourvenec family, are and have been for at least three generations, mercenaries employed by the U.K. government to conduct illegal operations that could not be traced back to the government of the U.K. in the event something went wrong. 

Ms. Martin says that she herself was forced to take part in many of these operations under threat of death if she refused. She told me she could not have escaped from her relatives because they had the co-operation of the port authorities and the police, and she is absolutely insistent that no matter what crimes they committed, or what evidence there was against them, there was no chance they were ever going to be prosecuted. 

She claims that starting from the age of 7 or 8, she was forced to have sex with numerous strangers, and that years later, after she grew up, she recognized some of them as highly placed political figures, including several Members of Parliament, leaders of other countries, and other well-known public figures. 

The Gourvenecs were entrapping these influencial persons into illegal sexual activities with an underage child and secretly videotaping them in the act for future blackmail. 

So far, the name, Gourvenec has not surfaced in the news reports about the ongoing scandal involving child sexual exploitation by highly placed individuals and a cover-up by the security services, but the similarity between what has been made public so far and the testimony of Eve Martin is too great to be ignored. There is a very strong probability that the missing link in the investigation that explains why the security serrvices would be part of a cover-up is the Gourvenec clan. 

--

Monday, 24 November 2014

Sex And The Gourvenecs

There has been a lot in the news lately about an organized ring of providers of under-age children for sexual purposes by wealthy and politically powerful people a few decades ago. And there have been revelations in the press to the effect that in at least a few cases, the British security services were involved, at least to the extent of covering up crimes they knew about and protecting the guilty. 

This is a very close fit to the profile of the modus operendi ​of the ​Gourvenec family, as told to me by Eve Martin, who is a relative of theirs and who says she was forced from an early age to have sex with a large number of strangers, some of whom she has since recognized from the news media as being among the rich and powerful. She also says that in addition to exploiting her for sexual entrapment for extortion purposes, her relatives were a team of mercenaries who often did jobs for the State security apparatus and were apparently immune to prosecution for all crimes they committed in the U.K. 

Eve Martin is intelligent, educated, articulate, and well-organized. She would make an excellent witness in a courtroom. In the course of nearly two months of daily interviews, most lasting for several hours at a time, she presented her incredible life story in a very believable and forthright manner, stood up to cross-examination very well, and all in all, would have been at least as convincing to a jury as most of the prosecution witnesses upon whose testimony convictions for serious offenses usually rest. 

Eve said the child-prostitution ring she was controlled by was international in scope, with activities in California, U.S.A. as well as in Britain, on the Continent, and in the Middle East. She named several well-known Hollywood celebrities and American politicians she was forced to sleep with. She also thinks there might be a connection to the group that has been revealed in Belgium. These allegations need to be investigated. 

At this time, there is still no evidence of a connection between the scandals currently in the news and the Gourvenec family of Sheffield. But the strong resemblance between what Eve told me several months ago, before these stories hit the news, and the stories now being told in the media suggests the ring supplying child prostitues to well-known people and the Gourvenec family may well be one and the same. And in that case, there are still some very important revelations yet to come. 

If anyone reading this blog has any information on the subject, please contact thekickaha@gmail.com, anonymously, if you wish, and tell what you know. 





Thursday, 20 November 2014

Some History Of The Gourvenecs

My informant alleged that the Gourvenecs had connections in France and have been in the mercenary and secret service business for generations. I have found confirmation of that in the following:




--

Who Employs The Gourvenecs?


A little while ago I sent an email about the alleged activities of the Gourvenec family to all six members of Parliament from the Sheffield area, where most of the Gourvenecs live. In that email, I did not mention the name of the family, only their type of operations. Within a few days after that, my profile on the Linkedin website was viewed twice by people named Gourvenec. Kevin Gourvenec and Marc Gourvenec both were searching around the internet for information on me. This indicates that someone on the short list of recipients of my email recognised from a description of their crimes what the name of the family in question was and informed them that someone was onto them. 

That could only have been a member of Parliament or an aide to one. If the stories I was told by Eve Martin, the Gourvenec family member I interviewed extensively in Guatemala several months ago were not true, if she was only spinning fantasies and making up the claims that her relatives are criminals employed by the British government for illegal operations, then nobody would have known from a description of such activities who I meant. I consider this recognition of what family was referenced to be very strong evidence that those stories are true. 

It is also equally strong evidence that at least one member of Parliament was already aware of those crimes. And saw fit to warn the Gourvenec family about me instead of contacting the police and urging an investigation of the criminals. So a member of Parliament is an accomplice to the Gourvenecs long list of illegal actions. I am not a lawyer and have no idea if there is a legal duty of an MP to report criminal activity of which he becomes aware, but even if there is no legal duty to do so, there is certainly an ethical one. And one that the public might well be expected to take into consideration at election time. 

There are also a number of international treaty obligations under treaties to which the U.K. is a signatory. Eve was unwillingly conscripted into government service. Both slavery and forcible service from underage children are violations of human rights. She told me details of several terrorist operations conducted by the Gourvenecs in which numerous people died. These took place in countries with which the U.K. was not at war. If the British legal system fails to deal properly with the Gourvenecs and whoever in London employed and authorised them, the U.K. could be charged in an international court with crimes under international law. 

At this time, I have no way to know which of the six Parliamentarians on my list was the one who knew of the crimes of the Gourvenecs, but there is one who at first glance looks more likely than the others. That one happens to be the Deputy Prime Minister. The reason I tend to suspect him more than the others is that for activities of the sort the Gourvenecs have done the authorisation of the Prime Minister would probably be sought. And since the Deputy Prime Minister is the designated probable successor in the event of the sudden death of a Prime Minister, it seems likely he would have to be kept informed of anything he might need to know upon assuming that office. 

Or I could be wrong. Perhaps the Gourvenecs and their sponsors are a rogue agency and not accountable to any elected government officials. In that case, the British public certainly needs to know all about them.